Will it Work...Literally

Today my issue with the iPhone (and netbooks for that matter) is that they are very limited when it comes to productivity. I don’t have a good solution if I need the performance, usability and capabilities of my notebook, but want something lighter to carry around with me. You could always get a CULV notebook or from Apple something like the MacBook Air, but that’s still a notebook. There is no perfect blend of notebook functionality with smartphone portability. If the iPad can achieve that, at least in the same manner that the iPhone did for smartphones, then I will consider it worth the hype.

Achieving that goal requires a delicate balance of the right UI, the right hardware (including ergonomics) and the right functionality.

The UI looks clean and snappy. Apple’s biggest omission here appears to be multitasking support. One of the most frustrating things about using an iPhone is its inability to do two serious tasks at once. Email + Web browsing, Pandora + anything. You get the point. This is perhaps a temporary issue. The iPad runs iPhone OS 3.2 as of today. The next major release of the iPhone OS, version 4.0, is expected to add multitasking support. This could presumably make its way onto the iPad later this year (or early 2011?).


Yeah that looks super comfortable...

The hardware looks good. It remains to be seen whether or not it’s actually comfortable to hold a 1.5 lbs tablet while you type on it. Although Apple has a couple of accessories that look to address that issue:

The software keyboard looks like it could work well, if it’s combined with the same sort of predictive trickery that the iPhone uses. I’ve been asking for the sort of tablet the Enterprise crew (Star Trek, not the server market) carried around. The iPad’s interface, at least what I’ve seen of it, has the most potential to deliver that sort of experience. The iPad UI could be something that feels like it was made in 2010, not 2002.

The functionality is also a big unknown. When the iPhone first launched its killer apps were the ones that Apple made for it. While the App Store is far more mature now, the iPad will need some key functionality for it to be a productivity device.

Porting iWork ($9.99 per app) to the iPad was necessary. The fact that Apple did this right off the bat indicates that at least someone over there knows that the market for a $500 - $900 toy is slim. But we need more. We need things like Photoshop for the iPad. Dare I say that we even need a port of Microsoft Office?

At CES everyone talked about tablets and eReaders being huge at the show. I saw a lot of neat devices, but nothing I’d want to go out and buy. The iPad is the first one I’ve seen with potential. And much like the iPhone before it, whether you like it or not is irrelevant - it will at least pave the way for other companies to emulate and improve upon the design.

The Basics The Hardware
Comments Locked

155 Comments

View All Comments

  • spunlex - Wednesday, January 27, 2010 - link

    Without flash you lose access to a lot of content and with a screen that size I think it will be very inconvenient. I think there will be a lot of POed customers when they find out the can't even watch youtube videos on this thing.

    Apart from that I really like the idea, I'm hopping something a little smaller and faster will be out by next year, doesn't have to be apple. I would seriously consider dropping my cell phone for something with real internet (not the mobile pages) that can be carried on my hip .
  • slashbinslashbash - Wednesday, January 27, 2010 - link

    Obviously you've never used an iPhone. iPhone OS has functioning YouTube, without Flash.
  • gaash - Wednesday, January 27, 2010 - link

    $499 is a version without WiFi .. $629 is really the floor price on a useful iPad imho.

  • spunlex - Wednesday, January 27, 2010 - link

    Oh and I totally forgot, where is the multitasking???
  • rs1 - Wednesday, January 27, 2010 - link

    Tablets failed miserably when they were tried years ago, and it's not going to be any different now just because Apple is giving it a try. The iPad will be on its way out soon enough.

    Move along, nothing to see here.
  • Stas - Wednesday, January 27, 2010 - link

    "Far more often we see Apple perfecting a particular device rather than diving head first into a new market segment. That’s not to say it won’t be successful. There’s always the iPod to look back on."

    No, there isn't. Creative, ASAIK, make the 1st mp3 player. So again: took an existing idea + made it shiny + millions into PR = sales$$$$$
  • jasperjones - Wednesday, January 27, 2010 - link

    There's an Apple II to look back on.
  • gaash - Wednesday, January 27, 2010 - link

    The "innovation" was iTunes not the iPod.
  • Sahrin - Wednesday, January 27, 2010 - link

    Which was an innovation, not for users, but for Record Labels (and Apple).
  • Anand Lal Shimpi - Wednesday, January 27, 2010 - link

    Agreed - to an extent.

    Many had MP3 players before Apple, but the MP3 player market before the iPod isn't like the notebook market before the current gen MacBook Pro for example. With its PCs, Apple mostly looks at the market and tries to improve upon existing designs, innovating where possible. The same thing can be said about the iPhone. Apple didn't have as established of a market to learn from with the iPod.

    Tablets have been done before, but not like this next generation we're about to see. I would've normally expected Apple to wait until the whole plethora of Tegra 2, Windows 7, Android, etc... tablets to hit before coming out with theirs. Instead, Apple is an early comer this generation.

    Take care,
    Anand

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now