Gold vs Platinum vs Titanium: Gains and Energy Losses

Stepping away from looking at just the Hydro Ti Pro, we also wanted to see how FSP's Titanium-rated power supply compared to the other efficiency tiers of their Hydro PSUs. Altogether, we have the 80Plus Titanium Hydro Ti Pro, the 80Plus Platinum Hydro PTM X Pro, and the 80Plus Gold Hydro G Pro, each boasting a 1000W power output. These units, all from the same OEM and generation, provide an excellent opportunity to compare PSUs with varying efficiency levels.

Starting with efficiency, a key differentiator among these models, the Hydro Ti Pro leads the pack as expected, given its 80Plus Titanium certification. However, the gap in efficiency between the Hydro Ti Pro and the Hydro PTM X Pro (80Plus Platinum) is narrower than one might assume.

The Hydro PTM X Pro, while trailing behind the Hydro Ti Pro, still maintains commendable efficiency levels, significantly outperforming the Hydro G Pro, particularly with a 115 VAC input. The efficiency disparity is most significant at loads below 20%, underlining the importance of considering low-load performance in efficiency evaluations.

From a pragmatic point of view, we can see that the absolute energy losses at 50% load are 16 Watts greater for the 80Plus Gold unit compared to the 80Plus Titanium one. Oversimplifying and assuming that the PSU will operate near or at 50% capacity across its lifetime, it would mean that the 80Plus Titanium unit consumes 0.016 kWh less per hour of use. Depending on how many hours the system is being used per annum and the local price of energy, it is easy to calculate the energy savings and determine whether they are significant or not - for most economies, the monetary savings will be $10 (or less) assuming an 8-hour daily use across the entire year.

Delving into thermal management, an intriguing observation emerges with the Hydro Ti Pro. Despite its high efficiency, it exhibits similar primary heatsink temperatures to the Hydro G Pro at lower loads. This similarity stems from the Hydro Ti Pro's fan, which remains inactive until a 40% load threshold is surpassed. This design choice infers that the Hydro Ti Pro can maintain comparable temperatures to a Gold-certified unit even without active cooling. However, once the fan activates, the Hydro Ti Pro's temperatures align closely with those of the Hydro PTM X Pro.

Guilelessness would instantly lead to the suggestion that the 80Plus Titanium model should be running cooler than the 80Plus Platinum model which, as we can see from the graphs, is not the case. The following graph however is illuminating - noise output presents a stark contrast, especially between the Hydro Ti Pro and the Hydro PTM X Pro. The Hydro Ti Pro is significantly quieter across all load levels, which could be a critical factor for users prioritizing a low-noise environment.

In terms of pricing, there is a notable gradient even in FSP own web store: $330 for the Hydro Ti Pro, $205 for the Hydro PTM X Pro, and $150 for the Hydro G Pro. This pricing reflects the premium placed on higher efficiency ratings, with the Titanium-certified unit costing over twice that of the Gold-certified model.

What builders get in return for the higher price tag is not insignificant. There's higher energy efficiency, of course, but those reduced conversion losses also result in cooler thermal performance, and ultimately, superior noise performance thanks to having to move around less heat. As well (and we'll see on the next page), the Titanium-certified model generally has the best energy regulation performance – though the Gold unit was no slouch in this department, either. So there are definitely operational and build quality benefits to going with a higher-rated power supply, which is what we'd expect to see given the costs and certification requirements.

Still, the data also makes it clear that we're entering the domain of diminishing returns when it comes to building a top-tier Titanium power supply. FSP's Titanium-certified unit exceeds all of their others, but not immensely so. Which means budget builders will likely look no further, though for buyers who can afford to spend a bit more on a power supply, there's plenty to consider here, particularly when it comes to how loud of a PSU you're willing to put up with.

Hot Test Results (~45°C Ambient Temperature) Power Supply Quality & Conclusion
Comments Locked

16 Comments

View All Comments

  • Surfacround - Wednesday, January 10, 2024 - link

    if anything he is “copying” his own web site (i believe) hardware busters. IMO, there is no better person to review PSU’s.
  • AndrewJacksonZA - Wednesday, December 27, 2023 - link

    Thanks for the detailed review, E.! I appreciate being better informed so that I can help people make better choices.
  • McGruberrr - Thursday, December 28, 2023 - link

    I purchased this PSU a while ago and encountered some qc issues with the provided cables. Specifically that several of the leads in the 12VHPWR connector were not secure. After fully seating the connector, two of the leads needed to be pushed into place with needle nose pliers individually each time it was connected. Otherwise, the compact dimensions and build quality look exemplary. My build was put on hold for other reasons so I can't speak to its real world performance.
  • wr3zzz - Thursday, December 28, 2023 - link

    Shouldn't reviews include comps to other brands, or a least a mention? This review basically just says FSP's most expensive PSU performs better than its cheaper PSU. It's useful I guess but doesn't help me much in choosing a PSU.
  • GeoffreyA - Thursday, December 28, 2023 - link

    My old computer had an AOpen PSU that, I believe, was made by FSP. It lasted 12 years, and still works, though that computer is not in use any more.
  • Rοb - Thursday, January 4, 2024 - link

    Unless I missed it you should have at least mentioned FSP's Hydro PTM+ power supplies, there's a reason the name includes the word "hydro"; but it's not because of the power supplies reviewed in this article.

    Their Hydro PTM+ series is water cooled, I don't know why these include that word; seems misleading.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now