Value Case Roundup: A Look at the Affordable
by Purav Sanghani on February 1, 2005 12:35 AM EST- Posted in
- Cases/Cooling/PSUs
Raidmax ATX-268WSP (cont'd)
We've taken a look at the features of the 268WSP including the internal design, but all of that can come to a halt when we see flimsy constructions and inefficient cooling systems. The 268WSP does not have much of a problem with that as other cases might.
Construction
The 268WSP is constructed of 0.7mm steel, which, in many cases, poses somewhat of a hazardous issue. The thinner we go with steel, the sharper and more dangerous those sharp edges become. Raidmax, on the other hand, has done a good job of folding over those sharp edges to prevent cut wires among other things.
The front bezel is, of course, a combination of acrylic and plastic, which gives the 268WSP a higher end look.
Cooling
The potential of the cooling system in the 268WSP is extraordinary! First off, even though the case comes with only two 80mm fans mounted on the left side panel, there is room for a total of four more 80mm fans and a 60mm fan. The four 80mm fans can be mounted in a 2x2 array at the front of the case, which will cover all four of the HDD bays.
The last 60mm fan can be mounted at the rear above the expansion card slots. Though the extra fans will definitely help cool the 268WSP extremely well, the noise produced by the extra fans will probably be intolerable.
We recommend using, at most, four fans to even out the noise produced and the temperature control.
The 268WSP is listed on New Egg as well as a few other retailers, which includes a 350W power supply. Our test model, however, did not include a PSU.
Installation
Since there were no special features in the 268WSP, the total installation time for our test bed consumed the standard 15 minutes for the motherboard, video card, HDD, and power supply.
We noticed that the motherboard connectors for the USB ports on the bezel were not the modular 7-pin type, but the 4-pin+GND type, which we have found in the past to be slightly confusing when using motherboards that do not have proper listings of certain pin headers. We'd like to see more of the 7-pin motherboard connectors to decrease this confusion as well as for added compatibility and standards.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
58 Comments
View All Comments
Phantronius - Wednesday, February 2, 2005 - link
All these cases reak of over the top design and piss ass quality standards. I've worked on a wide variety of cases and I gotta tell you, the cheap as cases look and feel like they were put together with monkeys.There something definently wrong when a steel case starts to bend from the weight of a PSU.
TheInvincibleMustard - Wednesday, February 2, 2005 - link
Agreed with others (#13, #46) about the PowMax ... the words "PowMax" and "high quality power supplies" do not belong in the same sentence unless there's the words "does not make" inserted between them. ;)All in all, though, I've got to echo what others are saying here. There is very little mention about the PSUs that come with these units (including that one that has 12A (!!!) on the +12V line). Your "average" system is way out of whack for these machines, too ... explain how someone is going to spend $100 on a high-quality PSU like that OCZ and then spend $25 on a case? Try again, Purav ... this time maybe with a system that would better fit the budget ideas behind a case of this price range? Sempron, s754, 6200, etc etc.
Agentbolt - Wednesday, February 2, 2005 - link
PowMax PSUs are extremely high quality, huh? Tell that to my old Abit NF7 that got fried by a ridiculously out of whack PowMax 400W PSU. Oh, and the 8,000 or so ohter people complaining the same thing happened to them on NewEgg.comPowMax PSU are absolutely and utter garbage that are too light to even use a paper weight. Anyone trusting an entire computer's worth of components to one needs to be shot.
hoppa - Tuesday, February 1, 2005 - link
#44 i couldnt agree with you more. among many fellow comp sci majors here at school ive got one of, if not the, fastest system, and im only sitting on a barton 3000+ / 9800 pro. i do have the zalman though =PAvalon - Tuesday, February 1, 2005 - link
We have hand-picked a full system that we believe is the current system setup for the average user.PC Mid-Tower Test Bed
Chaintech VNF3-250
AMD Athlon64 3200+
OCZ PC3200 DDR x 2
Zalman CNPS7000 Copper
Seagate Barracuda 120GB SATA
ATI 9800XT
OCZ 520W PowerStream
What the hell is that? Since when do average, everyday Joe's use 520w OCZ PSUs and Athlon 64 processors? Most users who would consider cases like these are using sempron, athlon, celeron, and duron systems.
If you want a decent budget case, my favorite is this one:
http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?desc...
$24 with shipping. Comes with no fans, but the PSU is sturdy and will support Athlon XPs, Durons, Semprons, and Celerons just fine, sans overclocking. The case itself is sturdy, and there are no sharp edges in it. Aesthetically speaking, it doesn't look beautiful, but it looks far from bad. I've used this case on quite a few occassions. However, I too would recommend ponying up the extra $20-$30 for an Antec case.
Cygni - Tuesday, February 1, 2005 - link
Dude, give it a rest... anandtech isnt a goverment body, and they dont have to retract anything, haha. EVERYONE has comments about how this or that detail is just BARELY off, or because AT "Shouldnt" be publishing an article because its aimed at the low end, or the high end, or the IT sector, or the Mac world, or whatever. The comments on most AT articles these days are just forums for people to bitch meaninglessly.sirmixmasta - Tuesday, February 1, 2005 - link
The Codegen 6209 has USB 1.1 front USB ports instead of USB 2.0 ports like every other new case. This case should CLEARLY NOT BE THE EDITORS CHOICE. The front USB ports will be useless for anyone with a new motherboard. I personally own other Codegen cases with the same USB 1.1 front USB ports and they will not work with any newer motherboard that is USB 2.0 compliant. The cases front usb cabling/connector will not correctly fit a USB 2.0 motherboard pin-out. Even when altered to fit, you will find that use of the front USB ports with a 2.0 complaint USB device will lock up all your USB ports or worse, freeze your entire system.This article should be retracted for the time being until this fact is confirmed or explained in some way by the author. I find it hard to believe that AnandTech would recommend such a case with this obvious shortcoming. Additionally, some of the other comments by readers need to be addressed as well.
http://www.newegg.com/app/viewproductdesc.asp?desc...
http://www.codegengroup.com/03_products/index.asp?...
sdfg - Tuesday, February 1, 2005 - link
Kristopher,Yeah, I think I do, too...
dgkulzer - Tuesday, February 1, 2005 - link
I bought a evercase 4252 for 45 bucks without a PSU. It had all the features that I needed like space for a 120 fan in the rear, 2 front USB, non-flashy design, and good airflow. I bought this case to replace a more expensive case (Antec Sonota) which I didnt like because it was the first case I ever had with a door over the optical drives and it annoyed me.My computer now has a Seasonic SS450 PSU, AMD64 3200 (S754), 1 gig of ram etc and I don't think I will ever buy a 'expensive' case again. If you look around you can find some very nice low-cost cases. I would generally replace the PS though
IceWindius - Tuesday, February 1, 2005 - link
I love my Chieftec Aluminum Dragon. Until Antec switches to aluminum, I will continue to turn plain jane cases into works of art using chieftecs